Faglig /
Map quality
Physical quality
- MAPQUAL
- Traditionally more geared towards printed representation
- More condensed visualization (high information density)
- (i.e. often smaller in size to fit screen/paper)
- SEQUAL
- Model environment guidelines
Empirical quality
- MAPQUAL
- Cartographic principles
- Colours heavily used (Bertin etc)
- Shapes should consider their geographical attributes
- Location of shapes are bound by geographical attributes
- Automatic layout of concepts are bound/driven by geographical attributes
- Aesthetics is orthogonal with geographical attributes
- Visualization is (often) inherently concrete
- SEQUAL
- Graph aesthetics driving guidelines
- Colour not commonly used - but suggested to use more often
- Location of shapes (often) free to choose (except topology)
- Automatic layout to improve aesthetics
- Visualization is inherently abstract
- Similarities
- Background guidelines similar (Gestalt and Bertin)
- Empirical goal (distinguish elements)
Syntactical quality
- MAPQUAL and SEQUAL are similar
Semantic quality
- MAPQUAL and SEQUAL are similar
Pragmatic quality
- MAPQUAL and SEQUAL are similar
- Important quality to investigate/utilize
Social quality
- MAPQUAL and SEQUAL are similar
Organizational quality
- MAPQUAL and SEQUAL are similar
Language quality
Meta-Meta Model
- Inherently different
- Cartography; point, line, area (concept, concept, concept)?
- ConcModel; line, area (relation, concept)
Domain appropriateness
- MAPQUAL and SEQUAL similar
- Cause: Cartography lacks language and domain discussion/separation/definitions
Participant appropriateness
- Cartography; exploiting "natural/cognitive knowledge" of participants - avoid learning new language
- MAPQUAL and SEQUAL fairly similar
Cartographer appropriateness
- MAPQUAL and SEQUAL similar
Comprehensibility appropriateness
- Conceptual basis
- MQ and SQ Similar
- External representation
- Visual variables
- MAPQUAL
- Allow for more colours
- Texture as variable
- MAPQUAL
- Composition of symbols
- (Graph) Aesthetics vs. geographical constraint
- SEQUAL:
- Placement of shapes indicate ordering - generally not "allowed" in cartography
- Linking line represent relationship - not (at all) in cartography
- Graphical effects of linking line represent attribute of relationship - not applicable due to lack of relationship etc..
- thickness of linking line - not applicable
- Shape with tab and sockets - not applicable in cartography
- Visual variables
Tool appropriateness
- MQ and SQ similar
Org. appropriateness
- MQ and SQ similar
Backlinks: